How is Sola Scriptura incoherent?

But it was not until the efforts to create a uniform Christianity at Nicaea that the concept became the accepted tradition, to create a universal (catholic) interpretation of the writings.

Later, Tertullian would lay the foundations of the Trinity.

John 20:17] Jesus said to her, “Do not cling to Me, for I have not yet ascended to My Father; but go to My brethren and say to them, ‘I am ascending to My Father and your Father, and to My God and your God.’ ”

If James Bond is meant to be the best secret agent in the world, how come all the bad guys in the World seem to know who he is?

Considering that the traditions stem from interpretations based off the writings, sola scriptura would be the means to test the coherency of the traditions.

For example, Jesus has a God …

So, how does that affect the Athanasian Christian doctrine of the Trinity?

What does it mean when someone leaves something in your house, your room to be exact, and when you tell them, they say they left it there on purpose?

A Trinity was first mentioned as G-d, His Word and His Wisdom, by Theophilus of Antioch.

The New Testament identifies Jesus. Literally, spelling it out in Acts 3.

Nuda scriptura is scripture alone. Sola scriptura looks at the writings and the traditions, with the writings (source of the traditions) having greater relevance.

How short is too short for a skirt?

But if you read it through the filter of the traditions of a Trinity, you will miss it (like many miss Jesus telling Mary about Mary’s G-d being Jesus’s G-d). That is incoherent.

How is Sola Scriptura incoherent?

Read also: